there anything that bothers me. There are cases that seem fair and legitimate, as gender equality and opposition to abortion, but before I would Appendix I had surgery to take a coffee with paladins.
All things considered, a feminist liberal (usually the first defender of causes) has much in common with a sanctimonious lady's Opus (usually a defender of the second). Both are fanatical, intolerant, think they possess the truth, not support the criticism and lack a sense of humor. That has some inquisitive sanctimonious falls within what is expected, but the liberal feminist also want to establish your own ironic inquisition. Will we have the Inquisition in the genes rather than ideology.
When released Godard's film "Je vous salue Marie" there were people who went to pray the rosary outside the cinema. The gesture seemed a bit ridiculous. A few days ago a group of students were topless in the chapel of his college. The gesture also seems ridiculous. The Rosary and the topless have more in common than you think. Both have felt attacked, one for a movie that no one forced them to see and others for a chapel that nobody forced them to enter. No one wanted to recognize the freedom of hand to watch their movie or pray in their chapel.
Reflecting on this dilemma that I attract some causes, but I repel their advocates, I found the following Sangharakshita:
" The moral crusaders are. Are scourges, I'm-better-than-thou, the people's moral shortcomings. In some cases, no doubt, his sense of injury is justified, but one suspects that many of them seek only to draw attention to themselves and make others feel uncomfortable. Some vegetarians, for example, makes it unfortunate that the meat eater. No matter how valuable it is his work, is the vehemence with which single-issue activists stress the unique importance of their particular cause which often makes their position suspect. In India I once met a man, Taking another example, I thought that anyone with a social conscience should help the lepers, as he did. If they did, were morally bankrupt. By identifying strongly with a worthy cause, you put yourself in a position of moral superiority. Create a situation where you're one of the few who are right, allowing you to look over his shoulder at everyone else. The more importance you give to your cause, the more importance you give yourself. "
I have not noticed anything I've tried to be above pro-life feminists and liberals, right?
0 comments:
Post a Comment